🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.